![]() "Cigarshaped", a certain professor Scott would be delighted to have your support, assuming he is still alive. Time for an alternative viewpoint to complement the traditional thinking that currently drives progress backwards! The mini moons have been electrically etched and continue to be so. The entire ring system displays electrical stability and has very little to do with gravity. You only have to look at all her weird characteristics and magnetic fields to see that her plasma sphere is a charged body, she receives more energy electrically than simple light radiation could explain. So with Saturn's moons we have a perfect opportunity to discuss the electrical nature of this gas giant. I personally had this direct from an astrophysicist "we know there are magnetic fields but we CHOOSE TO IGNORE THE ELECTRIC CURRENTS!" This is such a such a sad state of affairs, not only due to the 100 years backward progress of astronomy but also the shear waste of public funds chasing after these gravity fairy stories. Instead we have sloshing lava and other mechanistic explanations to avoid saying the 'e' word. So the intent seems to be to break the simple laws of physics and say that electric current cannot possibly be the CAUSE of magnetic fields, it is a mere 'byproduct'. Yet we have vast amounts of evidence that magnetic fields and em radiation accompany every phenomenon, star, galaxy or planet. It is dumped at the sidelines due to a number of wrong assumptions built up over the years. Very rarely if ever does the conversation swerve to include the most prolific force in space - electromagnetism. All effort is concentrated on forming a GRAVITY solution to the numerous queries that space throws back from their missions. Lateral thinking seems to go out of the window where astrophysics is concerned. The whole problem with all these NASA based discussions is a one-track mind approach. The research was published in the journal Science. The team plans to model different scenarios to find the most likely answers. The team still isn't really sure how these moons form, but one possibility is that a larger, denser object broke apart in the distant past and the fragments swept through Saturn's rings, collecting the dust and ice and gradually building up. ![]() Meanwhile the moons outside the main rings, including Atlas, Prometheus and Pandora, look more blue, thanks to layers of icy particles and water vapor sprayed over them by Enceladus' icy plumes. While the team doesn't yet know what minerals make it that color, they suspect a mix of organic compounds and iron. That showed that the moons closest to Saturn – Pan and Daphnis – are reddish in color, which is similar to the main rings. The spacecraft used a Visible and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (VIMS) to make a spectral map of the moon's surface, in both visible and infrared light. "A denser body would be more ball-shaped because gravity would pull the material in."Ĭassini's close pass of Pan, the innermost moon, revealed more clues about what these objects are made of. ![]() ![]() "We found these moons are scooping up particles of ice and dust from the rings to form the little skirts around their equators," says Buratti. The team found that the moons have porous surfaces and possibly denser cores, suggesting that they're growing bigger as they gather up particles from the rings. The new data revealed a possible explanation for how that comes to be. ![]() These Saturnian moons are famous for their weird shapes, resembling flying saucers or pieces of ravioli due to their lumpy bodies and bulging middles. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |